Party Launch · Volume 1, Edition 1Filed under: General DisgruntlementSponsored by no one. Funded by nothing.HQ: Wherever the wifi worksNow accepting rants, retweets, and resentmentParty Launch · Volume 1, Edition 1Filed under: General DisgruntlementSponsored by no one. Funded by nothing.HQ: Wherever the wifi worksNow accepting rants, retweets, and resentment
Judiciary10/10· CRITICAL

Compromise in the justice system in India

Adv. Parvez ShaikhREQ / 18785
All India, Mumbai Suburban, Maharashtra

Many citizens believe that the judiciary has, at times, failed to effectively discharge its constitutional duty as the guardian of the Constitution. Concerns are often raised regarding delays in hearing important constitutional matters, inconsistent judicial interventions, and the perceived inability to provide timely remedies against executive or legislative overreach. While the judiciary remains a vital institution in a democratic framework, criticism arises when constitutional rights appear inadequately protected or when matters of significant public importance remain unresolved for prolonged periods. Such concerns underscore the need for a judiciary that is not only independent but also proactive, accessible, and steadfast in upholding constitutional principles.

0 comments
Members only

Join the swarm to support this issue.

Free, lifelong, and about 30 seconds with your Google account. No spam, no fees — just a number and a voice.

0 Comments

No comments yet.

Members only

Join the swarm to join the discussion.

Free, lifelong, and about 30 seconds with your Google account. No spam, no fees — just a number and a voice.